<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 1:49 PM, aaron <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:aaron@pd.org">aaron@pd.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
</div>Very Punny.<br>
A "sound" data transport mechanism, but is it stable and reliable?<br>
;-)<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Aaron has a pair of funny nose glasses in every room...<br><br>The serious reply is: pulesaudio is a vast improvement over esd. (and esd was a HUGE leap forward in sound on Linux). The current work from the Fedora crowd (I think much of the pulesaudio dev work is supported by the gnome devels at fedora) has added much better data throughput controls. These were designed to reduce/eliminate stutter and jitter in audio feeds. So far it seems to be a well implemented project. <br>
<br>Since pulseaudio is a (predominately) gnome environment tool (as opposed to a fedora thing), other distro's should get the new bits shortly into their update streams.<br><br>It sounds all good to me </funny nose glasses><br>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
peace<br>
<font color="#888888">aaron<br>
</font><div><div></div><br></div></blockquote></div><br>James P. Kinney III <br><br>