<div dir="ltr">On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Jeff Lightner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jlightner@water.com">jlightner@water.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Curious why you didn't go to latest Fedora if you were already using<br>
Fedora? Given the short lifetime for Fedora releases there is hardly<br>
likely to be anything "more modern" than the latest Fedora release.<br>
<br>
By the way Redhat/Fedora/CentOS let you do the RAID/LVM setup during<br>
install or not as you choose. Why would Ubuntu require a separate CD<br>
for that?<br>
<div><div></div></div></blockquote><div><br>It's an incredibly flawed design that it requires a second CD to do anything outside the recommended partitioning scheme. <br><br>I wanted to have an encrypted partition for my laptop (business docs). AND the default is encrypting the whole system. I tried it, just to see its performance. On a Core 2 duo 1.8GHz / 2GB of RAM, vmware crawwwwwls. As does everything else. Nice, but no thanks. Just swap and /home for me....<br>
<br><br> </div></div><br>
</div>