honestly.. I would absolutely love if all of that happened just as you put it... (And it's also nice to see Oracle on top by a billion and a half on another note :) )
Just thinking back though I can remember this happening to a very large oil company and also to a very large telco provider.... Nothing was really gained as far as the end user. Especially with the telco.
Bell still owns everything and has the right of way to do what they want as they please. Prices have not dropped drastically and are not dropping currently. Additional features are popping up, But truthfully as far as service goes, (large scale connectivity) we got the shaft with Bellsouth. I would much rather have the service that Bell Atlantic offers. Would I have that same service if Bell was back as one? I would hope so... Obviously there's no gaurantee....
All in All, I would love to see MS brought down from the clouds and onto everyone elses' playing field. I just don't think it's as simple as saying "Just do it". Who's to say two seperate companies once owned solely by Bill, can not collaborate? (legitimately)
What are the rules as far as this goes? What does splitting the company up have to do with IE being the default browser in Windows? Would it be legal for MS1 that is over internet connectivity get paid royalties from MS2 who is over the OS for including IE in the bundle?
If it is, would Bill care that he's taking money out of his left pocket and sliding it back into his right?
Just some thoughts... I'm not sure of the legality and what stipulations would have to be enforced.
-Patrick
Bob ">bob@cavu.com> wrote:
> > From: "Patrick"
> To: "Bob" ,
> References:
> Subject: Re: [ale] CNN Poll: Should M$ be broken up
> Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 18:36:15 -0400
> Breaking up MS will just hurt everybody more in the long run actually...
> What will happen is this:
> MS 1 will have a monopoly in blah blah
> MS 2 will have a monopoly in blah2 blah2
> MS 3 will have a monopoly in blah3 blah3
1. If MS1 gets the Office Suite, there will be pressure to port to Linux and
Unix. Hopefully this will break the Winbloz monopoly.
2. Similarly MS2 that owns Winbloz will stop building special features in
that they only tell MS1, leveling the playing field for other application
companies.
3. MS* will lose some of its money illegally obtained from competitors and
it will go back to those harmed competitors. Everyone reading this who
makes his or her living (or would prefer to) by doing Linux or Unix
instead of Winbloz been harmed by M$. Future harm will be reduced.
A class action lawsuit could be filed.
4. MS* will stop its various illegal activities such as bribing companies
to not put Netscape icons on their "desktops" for their customers.
It will stop forcing hardware vendors to charge their customers for M$
whether or not they want it.
5. People will no longer think of M$ as the benevolent dictator.
6. Gates and Ballmer (sic) will be competitors.
7. MS* will be tied up fighting lawsuits for the next 10 years.
8. Those investors that made a deal with the devil by buying M$ stock
will get burned and will invest in Linux companies instead. (Hopefully.)
> And Bill Gates will still be sucking cash out of the economy like mad. Just
> because he's not "The Boss" doesn't mean squat really.
9. Gates and Ballmer already are worth 40% less than they were a month ago.
The breakup could not possibly harm the world any more than a united
M$ operating above the law.
> my $.02
> -Patrick
... and mine.
Bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Bob
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2000 10:20 AM
> Subject: [ale] CNN Poll: Should M$ be broken up
> > CNN is having a poll on whether M$ should be broken up.
> > It seems that everyone at M$ has voted.
> > http://cnnfn.com/poll/micropoll.html
> > Bob Toxen
> > ">bob@cavu.com
> > http://www.cavu.com
> > Fly-By-Day Consulting, Inc. "Don't go with a fly-by-night outfit!"
> > Quality Linux & UNIX software consulting since 1990.
> > No Microsoft programs were used in the creation or distribution of this
> > message.
--
To unsubscribe: mail ">majordomo@ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.
--
To unsubscribe: mail ">majordomo@ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.